The Governing Board unanimously approved a resolution calling for an M&O (maintenance and operation) budget override question on the March 11, 2003, ballot. The detailed resolution adopted by the Board Oct. 22 was part of the official agenda for the meeting and is available on the District's Web site. The resolution adopted by the Board states: "Funds derived from the Override shall be used to accomplish some or all of the following objectives:
Board members spoke of the need for the M&O override at the Oct. 22 meeting, and pledged to work for its passage during the coming months. Scott Barker, president of the SEA, pledged the support of the teachers association; and Joan Agostinelli, president of the Scottsdale Parent Council, expressed support of parents. Other individual parents, school board and legislative candidates, also stepped up to the podium during the public comment portion of the meeting to speak in favor of an M&O override. One person spoke against the override and the timing of the March election. He asked the Board not to spend all the money it receives from the state, and instead, look at eliminating programs. He also asked the Board to delay the ballot measure until the next general election in November 2004. In the work/study portion of the meeting, 2002 benchmark results were discussed, along with school improvement and student achievement. Dr. Barbara F. Erwin, superintendent, introduced the discussion by noting that the Scottsdale school community developed a mission statement and goals for the District 2½ years ago. Since then, administrators, principals, teachers, and other staff members have focused on all students, and have used data disaggregation to pinpoint areas for improvement. The Governing Board approved benchmarks for each of the District's goals in June. Benchmarks represent a measurable objective and set a minimum standard, noted Ann Boyle, assistant superintendent of curriculum and instruction. Ms. Boyle reviewed what has been achieved, and what is to be achieved under each of the benchmarks. Separately, Dr. Joanne Bauman, director of research and assessment, reviewed for the Board achievement indicators and how the District uses data, specifically test scores, to investigate strengths and areas for improvement in curriculum, instruction, teacher training, teacher performance, textbooks and supplemental materials, student preparation, and individual student performance. In addition to explaining the process used for analyzing data, Dr. Bauman presented 2002 test data and the recently released Arizona LEARNS School Achievement Profiles. (Test scores are available on the District's Web site at: http://www.susd.org/district/assess/testresults.asp and School Achievement Profiles are available at: http://www.susd.org/district/assess/achievementprofiles.html) In other work, the Board:
Additionally, David Goldstaub, clerk of the Board, responded to recent news and media coverage about the superintendent's remarks regarding the state legislature's failure to adequately fund education. "Local control of public education is an American institution. Unfortunately, in Arizona, it is more myth than reality," Mr. Goldstaub said. "Funding for education is controlled, not by local school boards and communities, but by the state government. Our community needs to understand that the state legislature determines how much is spent to educate our children-not local school boards. The meager funding Arizona provides for education impacts Scottsdale just as it does the rest of the state," he said. "I believe in accountability. School districts should be held accountable for the academic achievement of students. I do not believe that accountability should apply only to school districts. Over the last many years, our governor and our legislature, and their predecessors, have managed to grossly underfund education and create a $1 billion deficit that could lead to cuts-not increases-in future education spending. Many fine people serve in the legislature, just as they do on school boards. But, legislators should be held accountable, just as school boards and superintendents should be held accountable," Mr. Goldstaub said. "The bottom line is this: If we are to achieve the improvements in public education that this board, our superintendent, and our community desire, it will require the support of our governor and our legislature," Mr. Goldstaub said. "For at least the last decade, that support has been sorely lacking. I hope that will change. Though I chose different words to express my views, I want to make sure that everyone knows that Dr. Erwin has my complete confidence and support." Board member Tom Carey thanked Mr. Goldstaub for his remarks and said that Dr. Erwin expressed the state funding situation accurately. The next Governing Board meeting is scheduled for 7
p.m., Tuesday, Nov. 12, at the Education Center. |